I’m excited. Are you excited? If you’re interested in staying up to date about the latest research about newcomers, you should be.
I recently discovered that IRCC has an email list where you can get up to date research information directly from the IRCC Knowledge Management – Research and Evaluation department. Apparently this list has existed since 2011 (What? I know! I had no idea either!) and has been publicly accessible for about 2 years. If you’re interested in staying up to date on the latest relevant research about newcomers (and, of course, dear reader, you are, you are so very interested), click on this email link to send this email subject line “I would like to subscribe to Research at a Glance emails” to email@example.com and they’ll hook you up.
Since I recently subscribed, I’ve received daily emails, sometimes more than one a day. It’s an active list, and will give you a sense of the richness of research being done in our field, both in Canada and internationally.
The emails provide a great summary of the research, including finds, a link to the report and to more useful and relevant research
I’ve copied and pasted the email below as well.
Business ownership is higher among immigrants, but promoting self-employment is unlikely to improve outcomes for the less skilled
Magnus Lofstrom, Chunbei Wang
IZA World of Labor
June 12, 2019 | Le 12 juin 2019
“Immigrants are widely perceived to be highly entrepreneurial, contributing to economic growth and innovation, and self-employment is often viewed as a means of enhancing labor market integration and success among immigrants. Accordingly, many countries have established special visas and entry requirements to attract immigrant entrepreneurs. Research supports some of these stances, but expectations may be too high. There is no strong evidence that self-employment is an effective tool of upward economic mobility among low-skilled immigrants. More broadly prioritizing high-skilled immigrants may prove to be more successful than focusing on entrepreneurship.
Authors’ main message
Research finds that immigrants are entrepreneurial, as measured by business ownership. There is little credible research showing much of a downside to such entrepreneurship and much research pointing to significant positive contributions. However, promoting self-employment has not been shown to lead to widespread improvements in economic outcomes for less-skilled immigrants. Until strong evidence emerges that special visa programs lead to the greatest economic gains from immigration, policymakers may want to focus on education and skills as entry criteria, consistently strong predictors of immigrant success.”
Summary and policy advice
“Immigrant entrepreneurs make a significant positive contribution to their host country economy. Immigrants are more likely to own businesses than their native counterparts, and this business ownership contributes to economic integration. High-skilled immigrants have contributed to the high-tech sector and to innovation, as measured by growth in patenting and in science and engineering. However, there is no strong evidence that self-employment is a very effective tool of upward economic mobility among those in greatest need of such assistance: low-skilled immigrants.
Until there is strong and reliable evidence of the success of visa programs designed to attract high-skilled entrepreneurs, and of the criteria that work best to achieve this goal, policymakers may want to pursue other strategies to realize the greatest economic gains from immigration. Since education is consistently found to be a strong predictor of immigrant success, among both business owners and wage earners, polices targeting high-skilled immigrants more broadly might prove more successful than policies with a narrow focus on entrepreneurship.
So what can policymakers do to attract high-skilled migrants? This is not an easy task as migration choices are partly determined by factors difficult to affect through immigration policy (factors such as income distribution, language, native sentiments toward immigrants, location characteristics, and choices of previous migrants, to name only a few). Nonetheless, policies that could increase the number and share of high-skilled immigrants include efforts to streamline pathways from non-immigrant status (such as student visas and employment-based temporary work visas, such as the H-1B program in the US) to permanent status.
Furthermore, since migration decisions often involve a family, making the move more attractive to spouses is another strategy that might entice high-skilled migrants. Since the spouses of many highly educated workers are also highly educated, extending the right to work to their spouses is also likely to encourage additional high-skilled migration.
More specifically, providing work permits with a pathway to citizenship to graduates with specific degrees and experience deemed particularly valuable to the host countries’ economies is one possible policy strategy. In many developed countries, the opportunities to stay and work are quite limited for students who have just completed college degrees in the country. These graduates are not only, essentially by definition, high-skilled, but have also gained fluency in the local language and quite possibly generated valuable cultural and labor market insights. These are all factors associated with greater odds for successful integration and quite possibly for high-skilled business start-ups.
Successfully implementing such a strategy in the US, however, would necessitate addressing the numerical limits on employment-based green cards for each sending country, which currently prevents many immigrants from large source countries of students and H-1B workers such as China, India, Korea, and the Philippines from obtaining green cards. The uncertainty of obtaining permanent status may not only make the receiving country less attractive to some very productive would-be immigrants, it may also deter long-term investments, such as for business start-ups.”
View or download the full article | Consulter ou télécharger l’article complet (en anglais) :
Other recent articles from IZA World of Labor | Autres articles récents d’IZA World of Labor :
2019-06 : University study abroad and graduates’ employability Giorgio Di Pietro, May 2019
2019-05 : The labor market in the US, 2000–2018 Daniel S. Hamermesh
2019-04 : Can immigrants ever earn as much as native workers? Kathryn H. Anderson & Zhen Huang
2019-04 : Why do STEM immigrants do better in one country than another? Garnett Picot (IRCC) & Feng Hou
2019-02 : Improvement in European labor force participation Daniel Gros
2019-01 : Happiness as a guide to labor market policy Jo Ritzen
2019-01 : Crime and immigration Brian Bell
2018-10 : Taxpayer effects of immigration James P. Smith
2018-10 : Anonymous job applications and hiring discrimination Ulf Rinne
2018-10 : The portability of social benefits across borders Robert Holzmann
2018-07 : The labor market in Australia, 2000–2016 Garry Barrett
2018-05 : Do anti-discrimination policies work? Marie-Anne Valfort
2018-05 : The Chinese labor market, 2000–2016 Junsen Zhang & Jia Wu
For more information
Research at a Glance is designed to inform the Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) community and other interested parties about recently published, policy-relevant research from government, academic and NGO sources. The views expressed in the documents described do not necessarily reflect those of IRCC.
Please forward this message to colleagues who may be interested in subscribing to Research at a Glance.
If you have a relevant topic that you would like us to share, please submit it to Research-Recherche@cic.gc.ca.